OBJETIVO: Estudar um grupo de pacientes com lesão significativa em apenas uma artéria coronária e demonstrar se a ecocardiografia de estresse com dobutamina (EED) tem boa sensibilidade e especificidade na avaliação de viabilidade miocárdica nesse grupo de pacientes. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 20 pacientes submetidos a angioplastia coronariana transluminal percutânea (ATC). Esse grupo foi avaliado 2 a 7 (3,65 ± 1,69) dias antes do procedimento, e 2 a 5 (4 ± 0,80) dias depois, realizando-se EED. Para a determinação de viabilidade miocárdica foi utilizado ecocardiograma bidimensional três meses após o procedimento. Doze pacientes foram submetidos a ATC de artéria descendente anterior (DA), 7 de artéria coronária direita (CD) e 1 de circunflexa (CX). Apenas um procedimento (CD) não obteve pleno êxito. RESULTADOS: Dos 340 segmentos estudados, 99 (29,18%) demonstraram alterações contráteis, sendo 63 hipocinéticos (63,4%), 28 acinéticos (28,28%) e 8 discinéticos (8,08%). Quanto aos segmentos envolvidos, obtivemos sensibilidade de 92,59%, especificidade de 84,45%, acurácia de 88,88% para o exame EED. O único caso de ATC de CX demonstrou sensibilidade de 100%; para DA, sensibilidade de 88,58%, especificidade de 95% e acurácia de 90,91%. Para segmentos da CD, sensibilidade de 91,30%, especificidade de 83,33% e acurácia de 88,71%. Todos os segmentos discinéticos eram inviáveis. Dos 63 hipocinéticos, a EED previu recuperação em 91,48%. CONCLUSÃO: A EED é útil na avaliação de viabilidade miocárdica em pacientes com lesão significativa de apenas uma artéria.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a group of patients that have a significant lesion in a single-vessel and to demonstrate whether or not the sensitivity and specificity of a dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) was valuable in the evaluation of myocardial viability for these patients. METHODS: Twenty patients who had undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were studied. This group was evaluated 2 to 7 days (3.65 ± 1.69) before the procedure and 2 to 5 days (4 ± 0.80) after the procedure with a DSE. Myocardial viability was assessed three months after the procedure using a two dimensional echocardiogram. Twelve patients underwent PTCA on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), 7 on the right coronary artery (RC) and 1 on the circumflex artery (CX). Only one right coronary artery procedure was not 100% successful. RESULTS: From the 340 segments that were studied, 99 (29.18%) demonstrated contractile alterations of which 63 were hypokinetic (63.4%), 28 akinetic (28.28%) and 8 dyskinetic (8.08%). In reference to the segments involved, we obtained a sensitivity of 92.59%, specificity of 84.45%, and accuracy of 88.88% for the DSE. The solitary case of PTCA for the circumflex artery demonstrated 100% sensitivity. The LAD demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.58%, specificity of 95% and accuracy of 90.91%. For the RC segments, sensitivity was 91.30%, specificity 83.33% and accuracy 88.71%. All dyskinetic segments were unviable. The DSE predicted a 91.48% recovery rate for the 63 hypokinetic segments. CONCLUSION: The DSE is an effective test for evaluating myocardial viability in patients with a significant single-vessel disease.

OBJETIVO: Comparar a ecocardiografia de contraste miocárdico (ECM) usando PESDA e adenosina em bolus (ADN) com a cintilografia miocárdica com radioisótopos (CM) em pacientes (pts) submetidos a investigação e alta probabilidade de doença arterial coronariana. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 125 pts, 58,4 ± 10,6 anos, 85 homens, com ECM e CM, realizados com intervalo máximo de 4 semanas. ECM foi realizada com PESDA em infusão contínua em repouso e após ADN. As paredes do VE foram divididas em 3 territórios relacionados às artérias coronarianas, totalizando 375 territórios. ECM foi normal quando houve aumento da intensidade do contraste após ADN. Diminuição da intensidade do contraste em repouso ou após ADN foi definida como ECM anormal. CM foi realizada usando protocolos clássicos. Comparados por pacientes, foram considerados concordantes quando ambos exames eram normais ou anormais independente de localização. A comparação por território foi considerada concordante quando havia ou não déficit perfusional num mesmo território. A significância da concordância foi feita pelo teste do qui-quadrado. RESULTADOS: Em 106/125 pts ECM e CM foram concordantes (84,8% - p<0,001). Houve concordância em 342/375 territórios (91,2% - p<0,001). Para o território de DA a concordância foi de 87,2%, para CD 93,6% e para CX 92,8% (p<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Existe uma ótima concordância entre ECM e CM nos pts em investigação para doença arterial coronariana, podendo a ECM representar uma alternativa à avaliação da perfusão miocárdica.

OBJECTIVE: To compare myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) using PESDA and adenosine in bolus (ADN) with myocardial nuclear scintigraphy (NS) in patients (pts) undergoing routine investigation with a high probability of having coronary artery disease. METHODS: This study comprised 125 pts (85 men) with 58.4 ± 10.6 years, who underwent MCE and NS within 4 weeks. MCE was performed with PESDA in a continuous infusion at rest and after administration of an adenosine bolus. The LV walls was divided into 3 territories related to the coronary arteries, in a total of 375 territories. MCE was normal when an increase in contrast intensity occurred after ADN. The reduction in contrast intensity at rest or after ADN was defined as an abnormal MCE result. NS was performed according to classical protocols. When compared per patient, both examinations were considered concordant when they were normal or abnormal, independent of its location. The comparison by territory was considered concordant when perfusion defects existed or not in the same territory. The chi-square test was used to determine the significance of concordance. RESULTS: In 106/125 pts, MCE and NS were concordant (84.8% - P < 0.001). Concordance occurred in 342/375 territories (91.2% - P < 0.001). For the LAD territory, concordance was 87.2%; for the RCA, 93.6%; and for the CX, 92.8% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An excellent concordance exists between MCE and NS in assessing pts for coronary artery disease; therefore, MCE may represent a good alternative for assessing myocardial perfusion.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility, safety and accuracy of the adenosine protocol in the study of myocardial perfusion with microbubbles contrast echocardiography. METHODS: 81 pts (64 male, 60+11 years) were submitted to contrast echocardiography with PESDA (sonicated solution of albumin 20%-1ml, dextrose 5%-12ml and deca-fluorobutane gas-8ml) to study the myocardial perfusion at rest and after bolus injection of adenosine (6 to 18mg) and to coronary angiography within 1 month each other. For each patient 3 left ventricle perfusion beds were considered (total of 243 territories). 208 territories were analyzed and 35 territories were excluded. PESDA was continuously infused (1-2ml/min), titrated for best myocardial contrast. Triggered (1:1) second harmonic imaging was used. RESULTS: Coronary angiography showed 70 flow limiting (> 75%) lesions and 138 no flow limiting lesions. At rest an obvious myocardium contrast enhancement was seen in at least 1 segment of a territory in all patients. After adenosine injection an unquestionable further increase in myocardial contrast was observed in 136 territories (99%) related to no flow limiting lesions, lasting < 10 s, and a myocardial perfusion defect was detected in 68 territories (97%) related to flow limiting lesions. It was observed only 4 false results. There were no serious complications. CONCLUSION: Myocardial perfusion study with PESDA and adenosine protocol is a practical, safe and accurate method to analyze the coronary flow reserve.

OBJECTIVE: To identiy left ventricular geometric patterns in hypertensive patients on echocardiography, and to correlate those patterns with casual blood pressure measurements and with the parameters obtained on a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: We studied sixty hypertensive patients, grouped according to the Joint National Committee stages of hypertension.. Using the single- and two-dimensional Doppler Echocardiography, we analyzed the left ventricular mass and the geometric patterns through the correlation of left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness. On ambulatory blood pressure monitoring we assessed the means and pressure loads in the different geometric patterns detected on echocardiography RESULTS: We identified three left ventricular geometric patterns: 1) concentric hypertrophy, in 25% of the patients; 2) concentric remodeling, in 25%; and 3) normal geometry, in 50%. Casual systolic blood pressure was higher in the group with concentric hypertrophy than in the other groups (p=0.001). Mean systolic pressure in the 24h, daytime and nighttime periods was also higher in patients with concentric hypertrophy, as compared to the other groups (p=0.003, p=0.004 and p=0.007). Daytime systolic load and nighttime diastolic load were higher in patients with concentric hypertrophy ( p=0.004 and p=0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular geometric patterns show significant correlation with casual systolic blood pressure, and with means and pressure loads on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the normal pattern and safety of echocardiographic contrast in patients with no significant obstruction of epicardial coronary arteries. METHODS: 67 patients with normal coronary arteries or obstructions < 50% were selected from 277 patients who underwent coronary angiography (CA). Mean age was 56 ± 11years and 36 were males. At the end CA, echocardiographic contrast was selectively injected into each coronary artery. The parasternal short axis of the left ventricle (LV) was divided into six segments: anterior (A), antero-lateral (AL), postero-lateral (PL), posterior (P), infero-septal (IS) and antero-septal (AS). Anterolateral (ALPM) and posteromedial papillary muscles (PMPM) were also considered. The pattern and intensity of the appearance of the myocardial contrast was visually analyzed. RESULTS: The right coronary artery (RCA) was dominant in 60 patients. Contrast appearance was sudden and simultaneous in the 3 muscle layers. All segments could be contrasted after the injection in both coronary arteries. 100% of the AS, A and AL segments, 97% of the PL and 98% of the ALPM were perfused by the left coronary artery (LCA). P and IS segments were perfused by the RCA in 85% and 82%, respectively, and by a dominant LCA in 71% of the cases. The PMPM was perfused by a dominant RCA in 77% and by a dominant LCA in 86%. There were no symptoms. CONCLUSION: Intracoronary injection of the sonicated solution is a safe procedure that allows for an excellent opacification of the myocardium and can potentially be used during routine CA.